Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 13:33:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48FF2D595481C0F2D95D86A3E9F36DA5ED2A10D1944D350D69DEB72CEC9925C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note states there is no hard evidence of fraud, but fails to note that there is no evidence that proves definitively that there was no fraud. That leaves this tweet in the realm of opinion, and does not need a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681457896490696711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48FF2D595481C0F2D95D86A3E9F36DA5ED2A10D1944D350D69DEB72CEC9925C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1689773601853
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168145789649069671148FF2D595481C0F2D95D86A3E9F36DA5ED2A10D1944D350D69DEB72CEC9925C2