Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 04:34:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note states there is no hard evidence of fraud, but fails to note that there is no evidence that proves definitively that there was no fraud. That leaves this tweet in the realm of opinion, and does not need a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681457896490696711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689741278026
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681457896490696711229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F