Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 09:58:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65D6943EEDFA0402AD390D723D79894F7F8B49FB73070496CA0D0C78DD5AF390
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. They lost 15-0 as the article references. Put observations in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681432193904816128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65D6943EEDFA0402AD390D723D79894F7F8B49FB73070496CA0D0C78DD5AF390
  • createdAtMillis - 1689760701302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168143219390481612865D6943EEDFA0402AD390D723D79894F7F8B49FB73070496CA0D0C78DD5AF390