Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 16:34:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 761C5D7F1E1820A9EEC606D4EDD2103E132C40AA1C2D9E5459C5BEA48D48EF4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

伊藤氏を批判した人々も単に伊藤氏の解説に異議を唱えたり、反証を示したりしただけです。それは表現の自由の範囲内。清義明氏は伊藤氏を批判した人々を「教養ゼロ」と決めつけたり、「荒らされて」と表現したりすることは適切ではない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681423301950996484
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 761C5D7F1E1820A9EEC606D4EDD2103E132C40AA1C2D9E5459C5BEA48D48EF4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689957262080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681423301950996484761C5D7F1E1820A9EEC606D4EDD2103E132C40AA1C2D9E5459C5BEA48D48EF4F