Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 02:26:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F31077D503354A38A4FA86FFD34A9437C0A6F6CDAA9F945BB5E8A29F164B5FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

伊藤氏を批判した人々も単に伊藤氏の解説に異議を唱えたり、反証を示したりしただけです。それは表現の自由の範囲内。清義明氏は伊藤氏を批判した人々を「教養ゼロ」と決めつけたり、「荒らされて」と表現したりすることは適切ではない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681423301950996484
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F31077D503354A38A4FA86FFD34A9437C0A6F6CDAA9F945BB5E8A29F164B5FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1689733570834
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16814233019509964845F31077D503354A38A4FA86FFD34A9437C0A6F6CDAA9F945BB5E8A29F164B5FF