Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 14:32:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7DE205819E57A8A9C847333D21002595F7CED51AD9E8B05C8E2F256274D15CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note currently show for this tweet is irrelevant as the comment on the Maine Climate Reanalyzer page is only saying it is not a model itself but uses data from other sources.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681415749804408842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7DE205819E57A8A9C847333D21002595F7CED51AD9E8B05C8E2F256274D15CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1689777175211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681415749804408842D7DE205819E57A8A9C847333D21002595F7CED51AD9E8B05C8E2F256274D15CD