Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 17:45:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 596AA8E0DA0DBE4CCD88D342EDC127A5E2A7605B82BCBB3A74D385107D0CEB02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note currently show for this tweet is irrelevant as the comment on the Maine Climate Reanalyzer page is only saying it is not a model itself but uses data from other sources.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681415749804408842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 596AA8E0DA0DBE4CCD88D342EDC127A5E2A7605B82BCBB3A74D385107D0CEB02
  • createdAtMillis - 1689788743374
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681415749804408842596AA8E0DA0DBE4CCD88D342EDC127A5E2A7605B82BCBB3A74D385107D0CEB02