Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 13:36:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

De verwijderde tweet van Andersen was niet meer dan een sarcastische opmerking wat duidelijk is in de context. Het is geen poging om de meer plausible lab-leak hypothesen als complottheorieën weg te zetten. https://twitter.com/pjvanerp/status/1681223151009529856

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681279615074021376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689773783634
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681279615074021376F0403FB56922D0E57384740B4DE59521CDFB8AFD6769AC30AE3427F23D8B8F8F