Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-25 13:59:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7465E9FC0E7A1CB107388C6672D05AA078476CDB835E16DD63EF8858CD47D0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

De verwijderde tweet van Andersen was niet meer dan een sarcastische opmerking wat duidelijk is in de context. Het is geen poging om de meer plausible lab-leak hypothesen als complottheorieën weg te zetten. https://twitter.com/pjvanerp/status/1681223151009529856

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681279615074021376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7465E9FC0E7A1CB107388C6672D05AA078476CDB835E16DD63EF8858CD47D0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1690293558202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1681279615074021376D7465E9FC0E7A1CB107388C6672D05AA078476CDB835E16DD63EF8858CD47D0E