Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-18 16:56:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59D907B48ACEAED41CBFA078449805CD8E520DFE2D9E7EF1DF9F2058E84D5112
Participant Details

Original Note:

De verwijderde tweet van Andersen was niet meer dan een sarcastische opmerking wat duidelijk is in de context. Het is geen poging om de meer plausible lab-leak hypothesen als complottheorieën weg te zetten. https://twitter.com/pjvanerp/status/1681223151009529856

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681279615074021376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59D907B48ACEAED41CBFA078449805CD8E520DFE2D9E7EF1DF9F2058E84D5112
  • createdAtMillis - 1689699370832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168127961507402137659D907B48ACEAED41CBFA078449805CD8E520DFE2D9E7EF1DF9F2058E84D5112