Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-18 11:34:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 89C809FC41FEA65B810DB076F68E6927C2ECE013348092CC33A677233DFC8BDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

この裁判の被告は千葉県選挙管理委員会です(資料4ページ目参照) 英利議員個人ではありません。 https://drive.google.com/file/d/11AbPH3qf_bXRt7KzCh7glJpklzZnyHRJ/view また、票数が逆転したことについては、NHKの取材により4/25付千葉WEB特集で解説されています。 https://www.nhk.or.jp/shutoken/chiba/article/012/52/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681141167562575872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 89C809FC41FEA65B810DB076F68E6927C2ECE013348092CC33A677233DFC8BDD
  • createdAtMillis - 1689680081674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168114116756257587289C809FC41FEA65B810DB076F68E6927C2ECE013348092CC33A677233DFC8BDD