Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-17 03:28:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F615007BA2ECEE8FA416E15FA4F99DAC65F6936978331E2F2453E76121CB5BDC
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ツイートの発想があまりにも突飛で飛躍的な論理に基づいている事は冷静な視点を持って見直せば確かであるほか、明らかにツイート主による個人的意見であることは自明であり、よってこのツイート及びスレッドに追記ノートは必要ないと判断します。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680777647499128832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F615007BA2ECEE8FA416E15FA4F99DAC65F6936978331E2F2453E76121CB5BDC
  • createdAtMillis - 1689564486673
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1680777647499128832F615007BA2ECEE8FA416E15FA4F99DAC65F6936978331E2F2453E76121CB5BDC