Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-17 04:11:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8199FE7870CF639F694FE677C20974F4A835B83C5F765234D79F464ED2B1B77
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ツイートの発想があまりにも突飛で飛躍的な論理に基づいている事は冷静な視点を持って見直せば確かであるほか、明らかにツイート主による個人的意見であることは自明であり、よってこのツイート及びスレッドに追記ノートは必要ないと判断します。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680777647499128832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8199FE7870CF639F694FE677C20974F4A835B83C5F765234D79F464ED2B1B77
  • createdAtMillis - 1689567103638
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1680777647499128832D8199FE7870CF639F694FE677C20974F4A835B83C5F765234D79F464ED2B1B77