Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-17 11:27:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53DEB868CEC8DEEEB2F5AA84EE7334BA6558EA57BCC16A46E52E4F45C3728AFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This information may be outdated, while the study in question does exist here https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11110734/ The authors came back a few years later to talk about its pitfalls https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/34/1/149/638689?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680593477183086593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53DEB868CEC8DEEEB2F5AA84EE7334BA6558EA57BCC16A46E52E4F45C3728AFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1689593244400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168059347718308659353DEB868CEC8DEEEB2F5AA84EE7334BA6558EA57BCC16A46E52E4F45C3728AFF