Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-16 15:12:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91D3D5BB875AB06A97B057FEC73E06BB7647318DFC522CFC22C68BC53AFDF568
Participant Details

Original Note:

User fails to read the comments section. If they did, they would realise that many of the people in the comments are NOT joking, but offering real condolences; not realising that the post (and several replies) are not possible.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680498612202094592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91D3D5BB875AB06A97B057FEC73E06BB7647318DFC522CFC22C68BC53AFDF568
  • createdAtMillis - 1689520342340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 168049861220209459291D3D5BB875AB06A97B057FEC73E06BB7647318DFC522CFC22C68BC53AFDF568