Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-16 21:49:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60A9F0D978387C248E21BDE0A0F2DA9D408E44BFC6052091F88AB993636AFA8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

To the Noters above - that the article failed to pander to your particular brand of politics doesn't mean a note is necessary. Especially when the "panders to QAnon" stuff is merely personal opinion. If the tweet is not factual, state why.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680401510042308609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60A9F0D978387C248E21BDE0A0F2DA9D408E44BFC6052091F88AB993636AFA8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1689544151846
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168040151004230860960A9F0D978387C248E21BDE0A0F2DA9D408E44BFC6052091F88AB993636AFA8D