Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-16 18:42:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C11258C93EC023CC731C97AC54217E2CD99D41AB993C3881BD1C6C0FC643DE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

To the Noters above - that the article failed to pander to your particular brand of politics doesn't mean a note is necessary. Especially when the "panders to QAnon" stuff is merely personal opinion. If the tweet is not factual, state why.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680401510042308609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C11258C93EC023CC731C97AC54217E2CD99D41AB993C3881BD1C6C0FC643DE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1689532926539
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16804015100423086094C11258C93EC023CC731C97AC54217E2CD99D41AB993C3881BD1C6C0FC643DE6