Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-19 17:27:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6087A071372741550E140881A2366A6A5E6ACDD602C247C5FA20A8E3F6E90982
Participant Details

Original Note:

Singling Twitter out for this type of reporting, lends to a theory that mainstream media are actually “anti-twitter” The Tweets sources are mainly “opinion” pieces. “Experts” not named or codified as actual experts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680306391377125376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6087A071372741550E140881A2366A6A5E6ACDD602C247C5FA20A8E3F6E90982
  • createdAtMillis - 1689787627345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16803063913771253766087A071372741550E140881A2366A6A5E6ACDD602C247C5FA20A8E3F6E90982