Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-02 03:57:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A8601CF34C697DABCCE4112C18EA81802B3D9B85EA859B9A928F4E3A55236AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Singling Twitter out for this type of reporting, lends to a theory that mainstream media are actually “anti-twitter” The Tweets sources are mainly “opinion” pieces. “Experts” not named or codified as actual experts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680306391377125376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A8601CF34C697DABCCE4112C18EA81802B3D9B85EA859B9A928F4E3A55236AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1690948634383
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16803063913771253762A8601CF34C697DABCCE4112C18EA81802B3D9B85EA859B9A928F4E3A55236AF