Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-16 16:39:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E5D80EDC8EEFD5ADE1296FCBAB4B844F3C5A6A923E9F908EAA1459D3A53F5FCE
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note's claim that jobs created in 21/22 are mostly resumed pre-covid jobs is economically incorrect. Permanent job loss is 27+ weeks. Therefore no one laid off Q1/2 '20 re-entering labor force in 21/22 is returning to "same job", even if same employer (unlikely). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/business/economy/coronavirus-permanent-job-losses.html https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/06/coronavirus-permanent-unemployment-392022
All Note Details