Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-16 10:08:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44E33C4B7583370B75F8D5E036204DFEE122680D3DC0C3B4E6C93763A30CE2D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

「交付率の水増し」という批判はあくまで一議員の意見であり、表現の自由の範囲内である。 また、議員の主張は「簡便さ」ではなく「正確さ」を重視すべきと読み取れる。よってノートは必要ない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680160588029399040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44E33C4B7583370B75F8D5E036204DFEE122680D3DC0C3B4E6C93763A30CE2D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1689502116117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168016058802939904044E33C4B7583370B75F8D5E036204DFEE122680D3DC0C3B4E6C93763A30CE2D5