Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-16 12:52:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16A74C981070BE7AF0362E3347C4741AC8DDD48902560394E1A6172CA461EFB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

「交付率の水増し」という批判はあくまで一議員の意見であり、表現の自由の範囲内である。 また、議員の主張は「簡便さ」ではなく「正確さ」を重視すべきと読み取れる。よってノートは必要ない。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680160588029399040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16A74C981070BE7AF0362E3347C4741AC8DDD48902560394E1A6172CA461EFB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1689511976053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168016058802939904016A74C981070BE7AF0362E3347C4741AC8DDD48902560394E1A6172CA461EFB1