Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-24 13:36:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8450BC4793889A766CAB4C53DA127DE1D87169DCB04D56DF96B0233FBF6476C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current proposed note is a) biased, b) speculative, and c) seemingly takes a company's "gasp, of course we didn't do that" as truth. I don't know the truth of this situation & welcome other posts with facts, but the current note isn't what CN are for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680074670538731520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8450BC4793889A766CAB4C53DA127DE1D87169DCB04D56DF96B0233FBF6476C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1690205819036
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16800746705387315208450BC4793889A766CAB4C53DA127DE1D87169DCB04D56DF96B0233FBF6476C9