Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-15 11:32:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59D05859B9BC8A5EC61210931219DE69BE3103783FAEE47F722CA7EC2EBB9811
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current proposed note is a) biased, b) speculative, and c) seemingly takes a company's "gasp, of course we didn't do that" as truth. I don't know the truth of this situation & welcome other posts with facts, but the current note isn't what CN are for.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1680074670538731520
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59D05859B9BC8A5EC61210931219DE69BE3103783FAEE47F722CA7EC2EBB9811
  • createdAtMillis - 1689420770618
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 168007467053873152059D05859B9BC8A5EC61210931219DE69BE3103783FAEE47F722CA7EC2EBB9811