Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 14:54:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't make an assertion as to the constitutionality of this technique, he is just expressing his opinion as to why it's unfair despite being permitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679835519868387329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A
  • createdAtMillis - 1689346455540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16798355198683873296F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A