Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-15 01:39:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't make an assertion as to the constitutionality of this technique, he is just expressing his opinion as to why it's unfair despite being permitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679835519868387329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120
  • createdAtMillis - 1689385199326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16798355198683873294386DB9685499EDD6BED7C21BF013D445DB8F789619788C0F98C908DB4BC3120