Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 15:38:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 429BFA10516B53B186DD81990C15FB2145B3C04816654A01509425E3D6530F8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't make an assertion as to the constitutionality of this technique, he is just expressing his opinion as to why it's unfair despite being permitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679835519868387329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 429BFA10516B53B186DD81990C15FB2145B3C04816654A01509425E3D6530F8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1689349102005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679835519868387329429BFA10516B53B186DD81990C15FB2145B3C04816654A01509425E3D6530F8A