Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 22:20:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C59B26672B1DBDEB4ADB27141D65E6EB8084A0B262A38CC775AEC2C0F401539
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't make an assertion as to the constitutionality of this technique, he is just expressing his opinion as to why it's unfair despite being permitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679835519868387329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C59B26672B1DBDEB4ADB27141D65E6EB8084A0B262A38CC775AEC2C0F401539
  • createdAtMillis - 1689373245965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16798355198683873293C59B26672B1DBDEB4ADB27141D65E6EB8084A0B262A38CC775AEC2C0F401539