Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 18:32:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1929613D55BB40AD11C7503FA6DA298D4605E30F1B2D21869976BE287BEB44BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't make an assertion as to the constitutionality of this technique, he is just expressing his opinion as to why it's unfair despite being permitted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679835519868387329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1929613D55BB40AD11C7503FA6DA298D4605E30F1B2D21869976BE287BEB44BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1689359547331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16798355198683873291929613D55BB40AD11C7503FA6DA298D4605E30F1B2D21869976BE287BEB44BD