Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 03:20:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE308678363E1A6E2589FDC805538DF11CCBA8FB5DE7E8A1043E6C944669B1EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the NYT was just commenting on the lawsuit is factually correct, the lawsuit it mentions is not. Note is needed to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679321791913771008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE308678363E1A6E2589FDC805538DF11CCBA8FB5DE7E8A1043E6C944669B1EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1689218439987
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679321791913771008EE308678363E1A6E2589FDC805538DF11CCBA8FB5DE7E8A1043E6C944669B1EB