Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 12:08:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 934A05FC086298D8C285F6389ED6FAD2316F702A29B419DCEA20577816DF5750
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the NYT was just commenting on the lawsuit is factually correct, the lawsuit it mentions is not. Note is needed to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679321791913771008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 934A05FC086298D8C285F6389ED6FAD2316F702A29B419DCEA20577816DF5750
  • createdAtMillis - 1689250088231
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1679321791913771008934A05FC086298D8C285F6389ED6FAD2316F702A29B419DCEA20577816DF5750