Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 13:10:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56DC73BA289D167769F5405E636F2268A6DC571AE7FEEA4136630A4CDFE99B2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the NYT was just commenting on the lawsuit is factually correct, the lawsuit it mentions is not. Note is needed to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679321791913771008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56DC73BA289D167769F5405E636F2268A6DC571AE7FEEA4136630A4CDFE99B2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1689253820040
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167932179191377100856DC73BA289D167769F5405E636F2268A6DC571AE7FEEA4136630A4CDFE99B2B