Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 02:57:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13C825D270D7B6C26126C4CDE2AE44221E3F7CCB727C320EAE79F8287C9D72BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the NYT was just commenting on the lawsuit is factually correct, the lawsuit it mentions is not. Note is needed to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679321791913771008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13C825D270D7B6C26126C4CDE2AE44221E3F7CCB727C320EAE79F8287C9D72BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1689217071788
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167932179191377100813C825D270D7B6C26126C4CDE2AE44221E3F7CCB727C320EAE79F8287C9D72BE