Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 17:36:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B8C3300F23AB6B2ACB9B4CDAF8FEEF547CE739FB9A3AAB95E4D2F5C0EDA461F
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the NYT was just commenting on the lawsuit is factually correct, the lawsuit it mentions is not. Note is needed to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679321791913771008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B8C3300F23AB6B2ACB9B4CDAF8FEEF547CE739FB9A3AAB95E4D2F5C0EDA461F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689269783270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16793217919137710080B8C3300F23AB6B2ACB9B4CDAF8FEEF547CE739FB9A3AAB95E4D2F5C0EDA461F