Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 10:20:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE63E574E4DE578FBB1C5930E0570746851CD91B271982379F3E424A705F772B
Participant Details

Original Note:

A fala da jornalista configura uma crítica artística, que não caracteriza delito no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Art. 142, II do Código Penal. Fonte: https://www.cnj.jus.br/cnj-servico-diferenca-entre-calunia-injuria-e-difamacao/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679271428108034049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE63E574E4DE578FBB1C5930E0570746851CD91B271982379F3E424A705F772B
  • createdAtMillis - 1689243636272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1679271428108034049CE63E574E4DE578FBB1C5930E0570746851CD91B271982379F3E424A705F772B