Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 12:32:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA415EBDDD0A8B338C8D5D2711554A099293B39B6584D1B6682C1771FBC31DD8
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the other proposed note is factually correct, NYT is just reporting on the lawsuit here and has made no false claims. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679225630510948354
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA415EBDDD0A8B338C8D5D2711554A099293B39B6584D1B6682C1771FBC31DD8
  • createdAtMillis - 1689337937998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679225630510948354FA415EBDDD0A8B338C8D5D2711554A099293B39B6584D1B6682C1771FBC31DD8