Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 21:18:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C13690B476886C419E50B44D0857FFFC0E292403BFA28266C16CFC81FF0DAD80
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the other proposed note is factually correct, NYT is just reporting on the lawsuit here and has made no false claims. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679225630510948354
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C13690B476886C419E50B44D0857FFFC0E292403BFA28266C16CFC81FF0DAD80
  • createdAtMillis - 1689196738848
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679225630510948354C13690B476886C419E50B44D0857FFFC0E292403BFA28266C16CFC81FF0DAD80