Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 16:17:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58D1199CEF1A5B26B1B0BC4C2158496E9C2B95FD937530C4D6E7FDE9D151257E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the other proposed note is factually correct, NYT is just reporting on the lawsuit here and has made no false claims. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679225630510948354
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58D1199CEF1A5B26B1B0BC4C2158496E9C2B95FD937530C4D6E7FDE9D151257E
  • createdAtMillis - 1689265047912
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167922563051094835458D1199CEF1A5B26B1B0BC4C2158496E9C2B95FD937530C4D6E7FDE9D151257E