Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 17:07:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7C539821672BA60F4001D716AA1DCF6C12B8CFB5935A529DFAF0D8BC91874CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes referencing Twitter Safety tweet are irrelevant as they don't deny any of the claims in the lawsuit. They only claim hateful tweets had "reduced impressions", not deleting tweets that is the requirement under German law. NNN, Twitter simply needs to comply with the law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679121171718053894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7C539821672BA60F4001D716AA1DCF6C12B8CFB5935A529DFAF0D8BC91874CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1689181632626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679121171718053894F7C539821672BA60F4001D716AA1DCF6C12B8CFB5935A529DFAF0D8BC91874CC