Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 23:23:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3AB03A641C2A6E2CAE1BF84A33EC964FBC39472F17CD2B76E3E0C44546AC5C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes referencing Twitter Safety tweet are irrelevant as they don't deny any of the claims in the lawsuit. They only claim hateful tweets had "reduced impressions", not deleting tweets that is the requirement under German law. NNN, Twitter simply needs to comply with the law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1679121171718053894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3AB03A641C2A6E2CAE1BF84A33EC964FBC39472F17CD2B76E3E0C44546AC5C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1689204203654
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1679121171718053894B3AB03A641C2A6E2CAE1BF84A33EC964FBC39472F17CD2B76E3E0C44546AC5C5