Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 04:00:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is extremely misleading; inaccurate and factually incorrect claims are made throughout it. Twitter has responded, debunking many of the claims that were made: https://twitter.com/twittersafety/status/1678966763554324480?s=46&t=H6GHNFQff0HVwYE5yTpoWA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678971568674811904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1689134439454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1678971568674811904755E6639CD2D25B3A281E3A0965C5BCBFBE72A8A9C59F95E0FE1B81D3265F2FE