Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 18:03:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B976A2EC6A2E9265B88D31326C449A04E71EC8A1A4DFF7A550CE3D8B5228F38
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is extremely misleading; inaccurate and factually incorrect claims are made throughout it. Twitter has responded, debunking many of the claims that were made: https://twitter.com/twittersafety/status/1678966763554324480?s=46&t=H6GHNFQff0HVwYE5yTpoWA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678971568674811904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B976A2EC6A2E9265B88D31326C449A04E71EC8A1A4DFF7A550CE3D8B5228F38
  • createdAtMillis - 1689185004642
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16789715686748119041B976A2EC6A2E9265B88D31326C449A04E71EC8A1A4DFF7A550CE3D8B5228F38