Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 07:01:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 498AA0DBF813FEC969EAAB76F63AE47F9DEDCB125D8344EC26F8D06E15E6D72C
Participant Details

Original Note:

(A reply to another note stating NNN, don't rate this) While it's true that this tweet is not presenting any statements, it could be benefit from extra context, which is indeed one of goals of CN. (https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/es/contributing/values) Not all notes have to be fact checks.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678880415015223296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 498AA0DBF813FEC969EAAB76F63AE47F9DEDCB125D8344EC26F8D06E15E6D72C
  • createdAtMillis - 1689145296771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1678880415015223296498AA0DBF813FEC969EAAB76F63AE47F9DEDCB125D8344EC26F8D06E15E6D72C