Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 22:15:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

(A reply to another note stating NNN, don't rate this) While it's true that this tweet is not presenting any statements, it could be benefit from extra context, which is indeed one of goals of CN. (https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/es/contributing/values) Not all notes have to be fact checks.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678880415015223296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1689113723695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167888041501522329601D4689F2EE90812204A013E6AD7B88855DCD1FFAC7A24224C6DC0A0719DFEDF