Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 18:34:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This preprint has been removed by Peprints w. The Lancet because the study conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints w. The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if they determine that it has violated their screening criteria. https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678812961387708434
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D
  • createdAtMillis - 1689100465381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1678812961387708434F3E6ED0B5A5E158816274CEA463B017D9EB4940EDE4CF5AF9A11A7F386D0323D