Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 17:25:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

This preprint has been removed by Peprints w. The Lancet because the study conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints w. The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if they determine that it has violated their screening criteria. https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678812961387708434
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1689096330895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1678812961387708434801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED