Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 13:01:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C480012CAB22191EBED559B22D118FFD5AAA4CB9AB2F8C778F49D584073F3D2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

First comment under this tweet l links to a video of McCullough et al discussing the Lancet controversy. A key point of McCullough and supporters is that he has been unfairly censored and censured, so the Lancet rejecting his paper would be unsurprising and irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678745845254987776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C480012CAB22191EBED559B22D118FFD5AAA4CB9AB2F8C778F49D584073F3D2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689080507020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678745845254987776C480012CAB22191EBED559B22D118FFD5AAA4CB9AB2F8C778F49D584073F3D2F