Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-12 13:55:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AD2E265045075F1986A1AF9F05F8897862D0B5AD49C44E547F349792B8D2247
Participant Details

Original Note:

First comment under this tweet l links to a video of McCullough et al discussing the Lancet controversy. A key point of McCullough and supporters is that he has been unfairly censored and censured, so the Lancet rejecting his paper would be unsurprising and irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678745845254987776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AD2E265045075F1986A1AF9F05F8897862D0B5AD49C44E547F349792B8D2247
  • createdAtMillis - 1689170152095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16787458452549877768AD2E265045075F1986A1AF9F05F8897862D0B5AD49C44E547F349792B8D2247