Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 17:11:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D
Participant Details

Original Note:

First comment under this tweet l links to a video of McCullough et al discussing the Lancet controversy. A key point of McCullough and supporters is that he has been unfairly censored and censured, so the Lancet rejecting his paper would be unsurprising and irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678745845254987776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D
  • createdAtMillis - 1689095498264
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16787458452549877765E8FDCC52E3FC8B09A55582B8DF90A475C1D7F53245FBE1FCD024D16F1B9F27D