Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 15:38:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00CB6F08864A3F79FFF55AFBCC7FC57A1BBB5424C90EA8AC8049386FD6BEA8CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

First comment under this tweet l links to a video of McCullough et al discussing the Lancet controversy. A key point of McCullough and supporters is that he has been unfairly censored and censured, so the Lancet rejecting his paper would be unsurprising and irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678745845254987776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00CB6F08864A3F79FFF55AFBCC7FC57A1BBB5424C90EA8AC8049386FD6BEA8CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1689089904767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167874584525498777600CB6F08864A3F79FFF55AFBCC7FC57A1BBB5424C90EA8AC8049386FD6BEA8CF